Showing posts with label social networking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social networking. Show all posts

Monday, 24 January 2011

Library Day In The Life

I'm joining in with A Day in the Life of a Library... Like a ton of other people I'm tweeting a few of the goings-on at work (you can follow them here).

It'll be a useful exercise for me anyway, I'm meeting myself catching up just lately and could do with reviewing what/how I do. Not the least because one of the issues being addressed this week is the status or not of my own job (the good news being that I should still have a job somewhere or other this Summer!)

Hey ho.

Wednesday, 7 July 2010

Slacking

I'm uncomfortably defensive about days spent working from home. I tell myself that on the plus side I'm not going to spend four hours commuting, the network connection is faster and more reliable, I have access to tools that aren't available at the workplace, yadda yadda yadda... And it's true, I am genuinely more productive than at work. But I do still feel uncomfortably defensive.

For one thing, it's too comfortable. I've been sat sitting on the sofa working on the laptop, a pot of tea to hand, the Hairy Bikers on DVD for background noise (the remaining background noise being provided by a robin, a wren and a charm of goldfinches). This can't possibly be work can it?

Oh, I've done all the usual systems housekeeping work. And reported the (sadly) usual problems. I've run a pile of statistics to test an idea that was worrying me about distribution patterns of reserved stock and written a few web pages but I can't say that I feel that I've been particularly productive today.

Part of the problem is that the world has changed. What have I been doing while I've been slacking?
Nothing extraordinary there. You'll have done as much, probably considerably more. But have another look at that in the context of "work," without the use of a laptop and t'internet.
  • Peeking through a window to watch a conference.
  • Leaving the office for a day just to see a lecture or two or attend a seminar or meet colleagues from far, far away
In the old days what I'm calling slacking would have been A Hard Day's Work. Time was, so long as you clocked on and clocked off at the right time you were doing your work. It was OK to feel not particularly productive because you'd been In Work All Day and had earned your corn by your very presence. These days, I'm happy to say, the currency is deliverables, not time spent (shouldn't it always have been?). So where does that leave personal professional development? It was never much valued in the 'time served' model, but does it only have a utilitarian value in the 'focus on delivery model?' Dunno. I'd like to hope not; I believe that understanding for the sake of it increases the opportunities for the serendipitous development of solutions. But I'd be hard-pressed to prove it.

And I still think I've been an idle beggar today.

Friday, 14 May 2010

Just one big serendipity engine
(there, I said it!)

Excellent day out at "Liver and Mash," the latest Mashed Libraries event, despite a stinking cold.

For the first half hour I wondered to myself: "what have you been and gone and done?" and I expect there will be photographs of me on the web looking bewildered. But the venue was cosy, the people were nice and we were greeted with bacon butties before we had our coats off. And the ideas suddenly started to click.

The morning session was extremely quick-fire, which meant that the speakers had to rattle their way through a bewildering amount of content in very short order. Which turned out to be great: there was no opportunity to become wearied by a presentation and a lot of very diverse ideas and functions were given an airing. My notes suggest that just under a hundred different services were mentioned before lunch. Of course they weren't done in depth, the whole point of the morning was to be an eye-opener as to the possibilities, and this it did in spades. And some of the most interesting and challenging ideas weren't necessarily technical: I particularly like the idea of the library customer experience being a journey with rewards along the way. That's an idea we must be able to work with somehow: talking about it afterwards I wondered if the same shouldn't also be true of the staff development path. Besides that I've got a long list of resources to investigate and suggest to colleagues.

Post-lunch (cottage pie! it really was a cosy day!), the sessions were more in-depth. I now know enough to know how much I don't know about mapping APIs. I think I've learnt enough to explore a few ideas for mapping libraries and mobile library routes. I'll have to have a play fairly soon while I still remember what I think my notes mean.

It's been a long week. I started it by looking at integration and interoperability issues in Birmingham; spent a day in York looking at LMS developments; a couple of days back at the sausage factory catching up with stuff and collating notes on our customer-facing business needs (we'll draw a veil over the network problems and a couple of human communication issues); then this last day's explosion of ideas... It's going to be a long job to pull the strands together the way I would hope to do.

Friday, 19 March 2010

Social Media Best Practices for Libraries

Another useful checklist (why do they always have to have ten items?) of tips for social networking for libraries (thanks to Kasia and Michael). The tips are derived from a digital marketing conference; just because it's not "by" libraries or librarians doesn't mean that it can't be usefully applied in libraries. Like so many of these lists it's all dead obvious when you see it written down; deceptively simple until you try to apply them in practice. The sad thing is that I think Tip #10 is the single biggest obstacle for most development work in public libraries.

Sunday, 10 January 2010

Guerilla marketing opportunities

I couldn't resist having a go at this.

Aside from being a bit of fun this is also an opportunity to flag up the potential for unofficial, subversive advertising these days. There are so many ways for us to fall victim to stereotyping and lazy journalism (I am sick to the back teeth of our customers being referred to as "bookworms") we should make a point of getting the positives out there when we can.

I was bearing this in mind with our Facebook account:
  • We can be seen to be pushing good news items out to our "friends." Not only about our library service (which we should be doing anyway) but also things that might be useful to our customers and potential customers.
  • We can be friendly. We can like other people's good news. We can play Scrabble with our friends (one of our librarians is mad keen on Scrabble - she seems to have a couple of hundred games on the go at any one moment - and doesn't mind doing this in her own time for the fun of it). We can wish our friends a happy birthday.
  • I used one of the gift maker apps to build a "Presents from Rochdale Library Service" app. The gifts included the obvious things like "a best seller" and "some children's picture books," but I made sure it included items like "an under-fives' story time" and even "a smile." New friends were welcomed with "a smile." Cheesey, I know, but it seemed to go down well and the statistics showed that quite a few people were sending our gifts to each other. Sadly, the gift maker app I used became defunct just before Christmas and my app has gone the way of all things. It was fun while it lasted.

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Staff conference

We had a one-day staff conference on 21st October. As many people as possible got together at the Wheatsheaf Library for a programme of workshops, briefing sessions and keynote speeches about developments in the library service and the wider world. In retrospect there was just too much stuff to fit in but we only get to do it once a year and there's a huge pile of stuff to try to catch up with.

Alison and I were asked to do a workshop on Web 2.0. Given that most of our staff didn't know what the buzzword means the workshop was necessarily an introduction. We also needed to address the obvious and legitimate question: "so what?" If, at the end of the day, all you're doing is wasting your time playing with a new toy, you're wasting your time. Luckily we were helped by the fact that a couple of the briefing sessions were about public perceptions of council services and corporate communcations and marketing. A presentation and workshop asking people to think about perception, message and viral marketing fit in quite neatly.

I've uploaded the presentation to Slideshare.

Here are the notes


Introduction

We didn't want to have you sitting round computers for this workshop as:

  • We don't have the time to "show you how to do" Web 2.0 services
  • We don't want to anyway: we'd be spending most of our time
    • explaining the mechanics of one or two of the hundreds of similar-but-not-quite services that there are out there; and
    • complaining about the council's network connections;
    • (or else complaining that corporate rules block staff access to some key sites).

We wanted to use this as an opportunity to explain to you the underlying principles that makes so-called "Web 2.0" different to "Web 1.0." The most important of which is:

Web 2.0 is about people sharing news with other human beings.

The important word there is SHARING

There are all sorts of services on the Internet that let you share "news," text, links, messages, pictures, music and/or videos.

  • Many of them are free.
  • Most of them can share "news" with other services.
  • You aren't tied into using any particular one of them
    • you can have more than one service on the go;
    • if one service doesn't do the job you want to do you can try something else;
    • the one you're using today won't necessarily be the one you use tomorrow, or next week, or next year.
  • Most of them can "feed" other websites so that information there is automatically updated.
  • Most of them can be "fed" by other websites so that they include automatically-updated information.

Web 2.0 is "The Social Web" - people are sharing stuff with other people.



The Quiz of Quizzes: brand recognition and values

We showed you some pictures and asked you some questions:

  • What is this?
  • What one word do you associate with it?

It was important that we got the first answer that came into your head. We wanted to see whether or not you recognised the brands in question and we wanted your gut feeling of the value or quality of the brand. This last is often the difference between your thinking about buying something or not even looking twice.

What was the brand?What were the key words?

a Rolls Royce

Luxury — Posh — Luxurious — Comfort — Wealth — Big — Money — Affluence — Tasteless — Style — Bourgeois — Weddings — Glamour
Just out of interest: when was the last time you saw an advert. for a Rolls Royce?

a jar of Marmite

Horrible — Yuck — Toast — Hate — Runny — Awful — Distaste — Nasty — Sandwich — Strong — Healthy — Marmite

Marks & Spencer logo

Everything — Quality — Sell — Knickers — Clothes — Respectable — Pricey — Old — Grandma — Mmmm — Happy — Expensive — Underwear

pints of Guinness

Beer — Ireland — Drunk — Ugh! — Food — Creamy — Black — Expensive — Yummy — Drinking — Socialising — Pregnancy — Toilet — Bitter

Google logo

Internet — Search — Web — Ease — Knowledge — Information — Computers — Easy-to-use — Spam — Online — Links — Popular

Companies wanting to sell or promote a product or service put a lot of effort into brand recognition. They want you to know their product and they also want you to automatically think nice things about it.

  • Advertising's a tried and trusted way of bringing the brand into public notice.
  • They'll sponsor "something nice" — an event, a team, whatever — so that the brand gets a bit of reflected glory.
  • Sponsorship is also a way of making people see or hear the brand name or logo.
  • Word of mouth is the best advertising: if you can find some way of getting people to talk about your product or service you can start to reach more people than your adverts can.

If the word of mouth advertising is good enough for long enough you might not even have to bother advertising your brand!



It pays to advertise?

OK, there's a bit of a cheat to this: film studios are very, very, very nervous of putting film clips, or even trailers, onto video-sharing sites and when people upload clips from the film the film companies will contact YouTube to get them removed eventually. So the number of visits for The Pirates of the Caribbean are artificially low. The number of visits to the Derren Brown clip is roughly the industry standard.

Wednesday, 26 August 2009

While I remember...

I said we're exploring web 2.0 stuff. I should have mentioned a few other bits and pieces.

A bit of a facer

Inevitably, I've put the Library Service onto Facebook.

Actually, I did it ages ago so as to put the blocks on anybody wanting to pass themselves off as us. I've gone more active with it recently because there are a few ideas I want to explore. And also, if I'm being honest, because I got sick of hearing "so and so is on Facebook."

To my mind, there's no point in spending any effort in being on Facebook (or anything else for that mind) if you're not doing much with it. If your Facebook profile is just going to be a copy of your website you might as well just post the link to the website. (To be fair, that's exactly what some people have done and for that reason.) So if I was going to bother with it I needed to have something to do that warranted its use. Luckily I did:

  • A couple of colleagues are doing projects which could usefully use the informal interactivity of Web 2.0 to get input and ideas from anyone who wants to take an interest. Setting up pages for a couple of projects would give them the opportunity to experiment. Because projects have finite boundaries it makes it easier to get a sensible impact analysis. Truthfully, we're not expecting a huge impact: we're not publicising any of this work as one of the things we want to know is how much interest they generate by themselves. The primary purpose of the exercise is to give Alison and Ray the opportunity to test the environment.

    If you want to have a look at what they're doing on Facebook:

  • There's not currently an Events Calendar on the web site. We can, and do, publicise events on our news and events pages but a calendar is always a useful publicity tool. This is being worked on at the moment by the council's Web Team. In the mean time I thought it would be useful to use the Events tool to tide us over.

  • I want to explore the possibilities for using Web 2.0 tools, including Facebook, for viral marketing of the service and our services. I have a couple of ideas for this.

One of the questions for us to ponder is: who to have for friends. On principle we're working on the basis that anyone who wants to be a friend can be our friend. Ah, but what about the 'friend suggestions?' Personally, I wouldn't be going about asking people to be a friend. That's just the way I am: shy and reserved and not willing to be intrusive. Other, more sociable, colleagues definitely would and gently remind me that I'm the one always moaning about the "traditional" public library marketing ploy: "everybody knows about it, we put a notice up in the library." We're still finding our way, we'll see how it goes.