Sunday 10 May 2020

Baby steps out of lockdown.

Resuming business after closing a service — particularly after an unexpected closure — is always more work than the closing was. There are all the consequences of the closure to be tidied up, all the preparations for reopening, all the things that need catching up with before it's business as usual.

And then there's the additional complication where nobody knows if it's necessarily safe to go back to business as usual. And whether or not it will stay safe. It's like working in a building where you can't be sure there's not an unexploded bomb in the cellar or that somebody won't accidentally bring one in with them.

I suspect all returning workforces will have a tricky tension between the popular idea that they've had a rest so should have plenty of energy and the exhausting reality that lockdown will have released a lot of adrenaline over an extended period without the options of fight or flight. The challenge for managers is:
  • Not to fall into the trap of making the assumption people have had a rest; 
  • Making sure staff don't fall into that trap and start beating on themselves and/or colleagues; 
  • And also watching out for their own wellbeing.
The return to business as usual needs to be treated as a managed change process.
  • Each step must be specified, planned, and have a rollback plan in case of failure. 
  • The physical and mental safety of staff and customers need to be success factors as much as much more than the delivery of intended outcomes. 
  • An essential component is transparency: being upfront right from the start that business as usual will be a while coming and that each step taken towards it is dependent on the safety of staff and customers. It's imperative that all stakeholders are told this loud and clear.
There will be a lot of pressure for a sudden abracadabra transformation back to business as usual. It is the responsibility of senior managers and politicians to resist that. (Some will resist the responsibility or even be the loudest voices demanding a swift return to the old status quo. They will be godparents to the local 2nd and 3rd pandemic spikes.)

And then, of course, there's the question of how to manage staff who've worked throughout the lockdown. They'll need a lot of help processing the experience and returning back to normal. That in itself is a significant task and may need support from external agencies. Added to that is the need to manage the relationship between those who worked through the lockdown and those who didn't, the risk of resentments ("We had to work and you didn't," "Why are they getting special treatment?" etc.) needs to be managed out.

All of this is a big management load and I'm not convinced every library service is going to have enough management resource to do this by themselves, especially as many of these issues will apply to the managers as much as the people they are managing. There will need to be a national matrix of support coming in from both library and corporate local government perspectives. I'm hoping that the various national associations, professional organisations, unions and government departments are working on resources to help local managers address both the operational issues involved in the safe resumption of services and, just as importantly, the personnel issues involved in returning back to normal business in times that are very far from normal.

2 comments:

  1. This is a good example of the cautious approach to reopening. The author is upfront about what they don't know yet, too.
    https://christianlauersen.net/2020/05/10/experiences-with-reopening-libraries-in-the-age-of-corona/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Libraries Connected has some thoughts on this.
    https://www.librariesconnected.org.uk/news/safety-first-recovery-library-services

    ReplyDelete