Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Staff conference

We had a one-day staff conference on 21st October. As many people as possible got together at the Wheatsheaf Library for a programme of workshops, briefing sessions and keynote speeches about developments in the library service and the wider world. In retrospect there was just too much stuff to fit in but we only get to do it once a year and there's a huge pile of stuff to try to catch up with.

Alison and I were asked to do a workshop on Web 2.0. Given that most of our staff didn't know what the buzzword means the workshop was necessarily an introduction. We also needed to address the obvious and legitimate question: "so what?" If, at the end of the day, all you're doing is wasting your time playing with a new toy, you're wasting your time. Luckily we were helped by the fact that a couple of the briefing sessions were about public perceptions of council services and corporate communcations and marketing. A presentation and workshop asking people to think about perception, message and viral marketing fit in quite neatly.

I've uploaded the presentation to Slideshare.

Here are the notes


Introduction

We didn't want to have you sitting round computers for this workshop as:

  • We don't have the time to "show you how to do" Web 2.0 services
  • We don't want to anyway: we'd be spending most of our time
    • explaining the mechanics of one or two of the hundreds of similar-but-not-quite services that there are out there; and
    • complaining about the council's network connections;
    • (or else complaining that corporate rules block staff access to some key sites).

We wanted to use this as an opportunity to explain to you the underlying principles that makes so-called "Web 2.0" different to "Web 1.0." The most important of which is:

Web 2.0 is about people sharing news with other human beings.

The important word there is SHARING

There are all sorts of services on the Internet that let you share "news," text, links, messages, pictures, music and/or videos.

  • Many of them are free.
  • Most of them can share "news" with other services.
  • You aren't tied into using any particular one of them
    • you can have more than one service on the go;
    • if one service doesn't do the job you want to do you can try something else;
    • the one you're using today won't necessarily be the one you use tomorrow, or next week, or next year.
  • Most of them can "feed" other websites so that information there is automatically updated.
  • Most of them can be "fed" by other websites so that they include automatically-updated information.

Web 2.0 is "The Social Web" - people are sharing stuff with other people.



The Quiz of Quizzes: brand recognition and values

We showed you some pictures and asked you some questions:

  • What is this?
  • What one word do you associate with it?

It was important that we got the first answer that came into your head. We wanted to see whether or not you recognised the brands in question and we wanted your gut feeling of the value or quality of the brand. This last is often the difference between your thinking about buying something or not even looking twice.

What was the brand?What were the key words?

a Rolls Royce

Luxury — Posh — Luxurious — Comfort — Wealth — Big — Money — Affluence — Tasteless — Style — Bourgeois — Weddings — Glamour
Just out of interest: when was the last time you saw an advert. for a Rolls Royce?

a jar of Marmite

Horrible — Yuck — Toast — Hate — Runny — Awful — Distaste — Nasty — Sandwich — Strong — Healthy — Marmite

Marks & Spencer logo

Everything — Quality — Sell — Knickers — Clothes — Respectable — Pricey — Old — Grandma — Mmmm — Happy — Expensive — Underwear

pints of Guinness

Beer — Ireland — Drunk — Ugh! — Food — Creamy — Black — Expensive — Yummy — Drinking — Socialising — Pregnancy — Toilet — Bitter

Google logo

Internet — Search — Web — Ease — Knowledge — Information — Computers — Easy-to-use — Spam — Online — Links — Popular

Companies wanting to sell or promote a product or service put a lot of effort into brand recognition. They want you to know their product and they also want you to automatically think nice things about it.

  • Advertising's a tried and trusted way of bringing the brand into public notice.
  • They'll sponsor "something nice" — an event, a team, whatever — so that the brand gets a bit of reflected glory.
  • Sponsorship is also a way of making people see or hear the brand name or logo.
  • Word of mouth is the best advertising: if you can find some way of getting people to talk about your product or service you can start to reach more people than your adverts can.

If the word of mouth advertising is good enough for long enough you might not even have to bother advertising your brand!



It pays to advertise?

OK, there's a bit of a cheat to this: film studios are very, very, very nervous of putting film clips, or even trailers, onto video-sharing sites and when people upload clips from the film the film companies will contact YouTube to get them removed eventually. So the number of visits for The Pirates of the Caribbean are artificially low. The number of visits to the Derren Brown clip is roughly the industry standard.

Wednesday, 28 October 2009

Story time guides

This Flickr post provides an easy-to-use, step-by-step set of instructions for a pumpkin-themed storytime. This is cheap, technically easy to do and very, very effective. The instructions have been posted as a sequence of comments, which is a neat way to deliver the goods. There are a good many other examples to find in the Tiger lair photostream.

All respect and credit to Susan for having the wit and imagination to do this!

Wednesday, 26 August 2009

While I remember...

I said we're exploring web 2.0 stuff. I should have mentioned a few other bits and pieces.

A bit of a facer

Inevitably, I've put the Library Service onto Facebook.

Actually, I did it ages ago so as to put the blocks on anybody wanting to pass themselves off as us. I've gone more active with it recently because there are a few ideas I want to explore. And also, if I'm being honest, because I got sick of hearing "so and so is on Facebook."

To my mind, there's no point in spending any effort in being on Facebook (or anything else for that mind) if you're not doing much with it. If your Facebook profile is just going to be a copy of your website you might as well just post the link to the website. (To be fair, that's exactly what some people have done and for that reason.) So if I was going to bother with it I needed to have something to do that warranted its use. Luckily I did:

  • A couple of colleagues are doing projects which could usefully use the informal interactivity of Web 2.0 to get input and ideas from anyone who wants to take an interest. Setting up pages for a couple of projects would give them the opportunity to experiment. Because projects have finite boundaries it makes it easier to get a sensible impact analysis. Truthfully, we're not expecting a huge impact: we're not publicising any of this work as one of the things we want to know is how much interest they generate by themselves. The primary purpose of the exercise is to give Alison and Ray the opportunity to test the environment.

    If you want to have a look at what they're doing on Facebook:

  • There's not currently an Events Calendar on the web site. We can, and do, publicise events on our news and events pages but a calendar is always a useful publicity tool. This is being worked on at the moment by the council's Web Team. In the mean time I thought it would be useful to use the Events tool to tide us over.

  • I want to explore the possibilities for using Web 2.0 tools, including Facebook, for viral marketing of the service and our services. I have a couple of ideas for this.

One of the questions for us to ponder is: who to have for friends. On principle we're working on the basis that anyone who wants to be a friend can be our friend. Ah, but what about the 'friend suggestions?' Personally, I wouldn't be going about asking people to be a friend. That's just the way I am: shy and reserved and not willing to be intrusive. Other, more sociable, colleagues definitely would and gently remind me that I'm the one always moaning about the "traditional" public library marketing ploy: "everybody knows about it, we put a notice up in the library." We're still finding our way, we'll see how it goes.

Monday, 24 August 2009

By way of being an introduction...

I promised myself I wouldn't do this: there are tons of blogs about library service development all over the shop and is therereally a need for another?

Probably not.

But I do have a personal need to keep a running note of various strands of work I'm doing at the moment and this was the easiest (and cheapest!) way to do it. So here it is.

There's no good reason for this to be a private blog (except personal embrassment when I show myself to be entirely ignorant of the clever doings of the world), so it may as well be public. If you've any comments or ideas you'd like to share I'd be interested to hear them.